Dec
0

CDC and ADA Now Advise to Avoid Using Fluoride

mercola.com | November 13, 2010

A new study in the Journal of the American Dental Association finds once again that, contrary to what most people have been told, fluoride is actually bad for teeth.

Exposure to high levels of fluoride results in a condition known as fluorosis, in which tooth enamel becomes discolored. The condition can eventually lead to badly damaged teeth. The new study found that fluoride intake during a child’s first few years of life is significantly associated with fluorosis, and warned against using fluoridated water in infant formula.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is of a similar opinion. According to their website:

“Recent evidence suggests that mixing powdered or liquid infant formula concentrate with fluoridated water on a regular basis may increase the chance of a child developing … enamel fluorosis.”

Dr. Mercola’s Comments:

It was 2007 when the American Dental Association (ADA) first warned that parents of infants younger than a year old “should consider using water that has no or low levels of fluoride” when mixing baby formula, due to concerns about fluorosis.

Now the Journal of the American Dental Association has published a study that found increased fluorosis risk among infants who were fed infant formula reconstituted with fluoride-containing water, as well as used fluoridated toothpastes.

The authors noted:

“Results suggest that prevalence of mild dental fluorosis could be reduced by avoiding ingestion of large quantities of fluoride from reconstituted powdered concentrate infant formula and fluoridated dentifrice.”

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has also followed suit, warning on their Community Water Fluoridation page that mixing powdered or liquid infant formula concentrate with fluoridated water on a regular basis may increase the chance of a child developing enamel fluorosis.

They also state:

“In children younger than 8 years of age, combined fluoride exposure from all sources—water, food, toothpaste, mouth rinse, or other products—contributes to enamel fluorosis.”

This is as far as the CDC warnings go, however, and they continue to state that water fluoridation is safe — and dental fluorosis is only a “cosmetic” problem. In reality, neither of these assertions is true.

Dental Fluorosis is a Sign of Excessive Fluoride Intake

Dental fluorosis results in white and brown spots on your teeth. It is only caused by fluoride — typically due to ingesting too much fluoride during your developing years, from birth to about 8 years of age. According to the CDC, about one-third of U.S. children aged 12 to 15 years have very mild to mild forms of enamel fluorosis on their teeth.

Promoters of fluoridation say that these markings are “just cosmetic,” but it can also be an indication that the rest of your body, such as your bones and the rest of your organs, including your brain, has been exposed to too much fluoride also.

As Dr. Paul Connett, a chemist specializing in environmental chemistry, explained in our recent interview:

“We know that 32 percent of American children have been overexposed to fluoride because you have this telltale sign of dental fluorosis, which in its mildest form is little white specs. But when it gets more serious, it affects more of the surface of your teeth and it becomes colored; yellow, brown and orange mottling of the teeth …

The teeth are the window to the bones. If you’ve seen the damage to the teeth, what damage can you not see?”

In other words, if fluoride is having a detrimental, visual effect on the surface of your teeth, you can be virtually guaranteed that it’s also damaging something else inside your body, such as your bones.

Bone is living tissue that is constantly being replaced through cellular turnover. Bone building is a finely balanced, complicated process. Fluoride has been known to disrupt this process ever since the 1930s.

Why it’s Dangerous to Swallow Fluoride

The United States is one of only eight countries in the entire developed world that fluoridates more than 50 percent of its water supply. It is added under the guise that it helps prevent and control tooth decay …

This is in spite of the fact that there never been any demonstrated difference in tooth decay between countries with fluoridated and non-fluoridated water, and no difference between states that have a high- or low percentage of their water fluoridated.

Even promoters of fluoridation concede that the major benefits are topical; fluoride works from the outside of the tooth, not from inside of your body, so why swallow it?

The fluoride added to your drinking water is in fact a chemical waste product! It is NOT something you should use as a supplement to your diet.

There are plenty of studies showing the dangers of fluoride to your health, such as:

As far as tooth decay is concerned, this is not caused by lack of fluoride.

Tooth decay is caused by acids in your mouth, typically created from sugar being metabolized by bacteria (Streptococcus mutans), and as you may already know, the number one source of calories in the United States is high fructose corn syrup.

The acid produced then attacks your enamel. Eventually the bacteria can get into the dentine, at which point tooth decay sets in. So there are far better options for decreasing tooth decay than using a topical or ingested poison, with a chief one being minimizing your intake of sugary foods and eating a healthful diet.

You typically don’t find dental caries in more primitive societies that do not consume vast amounts of sugar like in the United States.

Make Sure Your Children are Not Exposed to Fluoride

One of dentist Bill Osmunson’s main concerns is water fluoridation for infants. The ADA and the CDC now both recommend that infants NOT receive fluoridated water for drinking, nor for making their formula, as fluoridated water contains 250 times more fluoride than mother’s milk.

“We shouldn’t fluoridate water and harm our most vulnerable,” Dr. Osmunson says.

It is my strong belief and recommendation to avoid giving your children fluoridated water.

Unfortunately, the only way to ensure your water is pure enough to drink is by installing ahigh quality water filtration system in your house, such as a reverse osmosis filter that can filter out much of the fluoride and other dangerous water contaminants like disinfection byproducts (DBPs).

Remember that most bottled water also typically contains fluoride, even though it’s not stated on the label, and whatever you do, avoid using “nursery water,” which is fluoridated water sold specifically for infants.

Fluoride in your drinking water is one more reason why breastfeeding your infant is so essential. Nature has kept breast milk virtually fluoride-free for a reason.

If you are unable to breastfeed and are instead using formula, make sure the water you use is fluoride-free. Again, for now the best way you can provide pure, fluoride-free water to your family is by using a reverse osmosis filter, which you can install in your home.

Even better, if you are unable to breastfeed use this recipe to make homemade infant formula using raw milk and no water at all.

Keep in mind also that if you are a pregnant woman it is equally important for your water to be fluoride-free, as this chemical can harm your developing fetus.

The Ultimate Solution is to Get Fluoride Out of Tap Water

Even though the ADA and the CDC have issued warnings that parents not use fluoridated tap water to make infant formula, neither of them has openly informed the public!

So there are millions of parents out there using tap water to make up formula, oblivious of the fact that the agencies that promote fluoridation in this country have issued a specific warning against using fluoridated water for this purpose.

Not only that, but by fluoridating the municipal water supply you doom many low-income families to fail to protect their young children from this dangerous drug, even if they have this information, as they simply don’t have the resources to install a reverse osmosis system.

This is why the only real solution is to stop the archaic practice of water fluoridation in the United States.

The Fluoride Action Network is an absolutely phenomenal resource for further education, and they’re doing much to pressure the US government for change. We will be working together to devise a complete game plan to tackle this issue head on. Once we reach the tipping point, which may be as little as 5 percent of the population, we will be able to reverse the policies of water fluoridation.

Our strategy will begin with addressing Canada, because 60 percent of Canada is already un-fluoridated. If we can get the rest of Canada to stop fluoridating their water, we believe the U.S. will be forced to follow.

You can visit www.FluorideAlert.org for the most recent updates and progress, as well as tips on how you can get involved and take action in this important cause.

In addition, I highly recommend getting a copy of Dr. Connett’s new book, The Case Against Fluoride, for more information on the bad science and political agendas that got this toxic chemical in our drinking water and is, at least for now, keeping it there.

Nov
0

Robert Gibbs Confronted on #ows and the Federal Reserve

On October 20th former White House press secretary/Obama adviser Robert Gibbs hosted a press conference at Trump Towers in Chicago. We are Change Chicago reporter Tim Marszalik attended and asked the tough questions that the local presstitutes refused to ask.

YouTube Preview Image
Oct
0

Herman Cain Confronted on the Private Federal Reserve

We Are Change Chicago
10/13/2011

CHICAGO, IL- As the mainstream media and the powers that be continue to throw new puppets into the race for the GOP’s top spot. Their latest love child Herman Cain has come out of nowhere. The Washington Times Reports Cain as the new GOP front-runner, and according to the new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll Cain leads former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney by just 4 points. But questions continue to rise surrounding Herman’s days as Kansas City Board President of the Federal Reserve Bank; as the general public discovers the actions of this Private Central Bank as well as his close ties to former Fed President Alan Greenspan. Speaking to We Are Change Chicago reporters Julio Noel Rausseo and Tim Marszalik, at Tea Con 2011 outside of Chicago, Cain defends the role of the Private Central bank. He’s asked about the constitutionality of the Federal Reserve, and whether or not its right that this private banking cartel prints money out of thin air, while at the same time devaluing their beloved Federal Reserve Note.


Julio N. Rausseo

YouTube Preview Image
Apr
0

Mark Jungwirth’s First Documentary Film

Mark Jungwirth of We Are Change Oshkosh has released his first documentary film.  It reveals alarming evidence that the Fond Du Lac Police department is actively covering up the truth about an altercation that took place on the morning of March 20, 2011 and resulted in two deaths.  Members of We Are Change Chicago have recently learned first hand how blatantly and shamelessly corrupt police officers can be (A WACC member was assaulted by an officer, and then arrested for assault).  Of course, this is not to say that all police officers are corrupt.  That is certainly not the case.  While this remains true, the events outlined in this film represent just one example of the kind of corruption that doubtlessly occurs quite often.  Luckily, in this case, Mark Jungwirth was paying close enough attention and has outlined the story for us along with much of the information the mainstream press omitted or was not given.

YouTube Preview Image
Apr
0

March 19, 2011 anti-war march on the 8th anniversary of the Iraq War

On March 19th an anti-war rally and march was held in downtown Chicago.  As always We Are Change Chicago was in attendance to support peace and to express the fact that our violent/criminal government does not represent us.

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image
Jan
0

Reality Report Fluoride Coverage features Republic Now of Eastern Iowa

Brandon Echols, Coordinator of Republic Now of Iowa


As I sat on my personnel directors couch wondering what the sly smile on his face was about, I saw Gary Franchi take center-stage on the 57inch wide screen television in front of me.

But this just wasn’t any night, this was Conspiracy Documentary Night at Alvin Whitchers. And this night, Alvin knew something that I or our Campaigns Manager, Adam Brown, didn’t.

“Hey, watch this guys.” It sounded so typical, little did we know that we were in for the shock of our activist lives. Gary Franchi left and a news anchor came on and began speaking of the Federal Government taking a serious look at the dangerous effects of Fluoride in the tapwater.

The Reality Report flashed through one set of footage from local activists all over the nation in response to Alex jones and Infowars’ “There Is Poison In The tap Water” flyer campaign
And suddenly there it was. Republic Now’s video footage of our flyering Cedar Rapids and Marion, Iowa.

I jumped off the couch. Adam Brown looked completely shocked and all he could do was utter “No way…is that…is that?”

We were quite honored to be mentioned alongside other great activist groups such as We Are Change Wichita. But the most important fact of the broadcast was that the government will be reducing the fluoride levels in the water supply and bringing the idea of fluoridation into direct questioning, after decades of medicating us through the water supply. And six months after the flyer campaigns the government has caved into public pressure.
Let us push this attack on all fronts and not let up!

The official anti-fluoridation website for the great state of Iowa is JustWaterPlease.com and our own activist website is RepublicNow.tv

YouTube Preview Image

Editor’s Note: When asked about getting involved and the difference it can make, which perfectly is exemplified by this article and these videos, Brandon Stated:

“Going out and getting active in a small town or county area is simple and easy. All you need is a passion and desire to change the world, one town at a time. You can affect a large group of people by focusing on what you know, and what the people in your community are concerned about.”

Jan
0

US says fluoride is causing splotchy teeth, maybe other ills; calls for lower levels in water

9:18 p.m. CST, January 7, 2011

ATLANTA (AP) — In a remarkable turnabout, federal health officials say many Americans are now getting too much fluoride because of its presence not just in drinking water but in toothpaste, mouthwash and other products, and it’s causing splotches on children’s teeth and perhaps more serious problems.

FILE - In this June 3, 2008 file photo, Liberty Valley Elementary School, Danville, Pa., kindergarten student Tianna Swisher attempts to drink from the water fountain at Montour Preserve, near Washingtonville, Pa., during the school's outdoor field trip. Fluoride in drinking water, credited with dramatically cutting cavities and tooth decay, may now be too much of a good thing. It's causing spots on some kids' teeth. A reported increase in the spotting problem is one reason the federal government will announce Friday, Jan. 7, 2011, it plans to lower the recommended limit for fluoride in water supplies, the first such change in nearly 50 years. (AP Photo/Bloomsburg Press Enterprise, Bill Hughes, File) (Bill Hughes, AP / June 3, 2008)

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced plans Friday to lower the recommended level of fluoride in drinking water for the first time in nearly 50 years, based on a fresh review of the science.

The announcement is likely to renew the battle over fluoridation, even though the addition of fluoride to drinking water is considered one of the greatest public health successes of the 20th century. The U.S. prevalence of decay in at least one tooth among teens has declined from about 90 percent to 60 percent.

The government first began urging municipal water systems to add fluoride in the early 1950s. Since then, it has been put in toothpaste and mouthwash. It is also in a lot of bottled water and in soda. Some kids even take fluoride supplements. Now, young children may be getting too much.

“Like anything else, you can have too much of a good thing,” said Dr. Howard Pollick, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco’s dental school and spokesman for the American Dental Association.

One reason behind the change: About 2 out of 5 adolescents have tooth streaking or spottiness because of too much fluoride, a government study found recently. In extreme cases, teeth can be pitted by the mineral — though many cases are so mild only dentists notice it. The problem is generally considered cosmetic and not a reason for serious concern.

The splotchy tooth condition, fluorosis, is unexpectedly common in youngsters ages 12 through 15 and appears to have grown more common since the 1980s, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

But there are also growing worries about more serious dangers from fluoride.

The Environmental Protection Agency released two new reviews of research on fluoride Friday. One of the studies found that prolonged, high intake of fluoride can increase the risk of brittle bones, fractures and crippling bone abnormalities.

Critics of fluoridated water seized on the proposed change Friday to renew their attacks on it — a battle that dates back to at least the Cold War 1950s, when it was denounced by some as a step toward Communism. Many activists nowadays don’t think fluoride is essential, and they praised the government’s new steps.

“Anybody who was anti-fluoride was considered crazy,” said Deborah Catrow, who successfully fought a ballot proposal in 2005 that would have added fluoride to drinking water in Springfield, Ohio. “It’s amazing that people have been so convinced that this is an OK thing to do.”

Dental and medical groups applauded the announcement.

“This change is necessary because Americans have access to more sources of fluoride than they did when water fluoridation was first introduced,” Dr. O. Marion Burton, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said in a statement.

The fluoridated water standard since 1962 has been a range of 0.7 parts per million for warmer climates where people used to drink more water to 1.2 parts per million in cooler regions. The new proposal from HHS would set the recommended level at just 0.7. Meanwhile, the EPA said it is reviewing whether to lower the maximum allowable level of fluoride in drinking water from the current 4 parts per million.

“EPA’s new analysis will help us make sure that people benefit from tooth decay prevention while at the same time avoiding the unwanted health effects from too much fluoride,” said Peter Silva, an EPA assistant administrator.

Fluoride is a mineral that exists in water and soil. About 70 years ago, scientists discovered that people whose supplies naturally had more fluoride also had fewer cavities.

In 1945, Grand Rapids, Mich., became the world’s first city to add fluoride to its drinking water. Six years later a study found a dramatic decline in tooth decay among children there, and the surgeon general endorsed water fluoridation.

And in 1955, Procter & Gamble Co. marketed the first fluoride toothpaste, Crest, with the slogan “Look, Mom, no cavities!”

But that same year, The New York Times called fluoridation of public water one of the country’s “fiercest controversies.” The story said some opponents called the campaign for fluoridation “the work of Communists who want to soften the brains of the American people.”

The battles continue for a variety of reasons today.

In New York, the village of Cobleskill outside Albany stopped adding fluoride to its drinking water in 2007 after the longtime water superintendent became convinced the additive was contributing to his knee problems. Two years later, the village reversed the move after dentists and doctors complained.

According to a recent CDC report, nearly 23 percent of children ages 12 to 15 had fluorosis in a study done in 1986-87. That rose to 41 percent in a study that covered 1999 through 2004.

“The report of discoloration has been going up over the years,” said Dr. Robert Barsley, a professor at the LSU Health Sciences Center School of Dentistry. “It is not the water that’s causing this by any means. It’s the extra fluoride products — toothpaste, mouthwash — that people are using. And people want nice white teeth so they brush three times a day.”

Susan Jeansonne, oral health program manager for Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, said one reason for the problem is children swallowing fluoride toothpaste or eating it.

Toothpaste labels have long recommended that parents supervise children under 6 when they are brushing their teeth; give them only a pea-size amount; and make sure they spit it out. Toddlers under 2 shouldn’t use toothpaste with fluoride.

In 2006, the National Academy of Sciences released a report recommending that the EPA lower its maximum allowable level of fluoride in drinking water. The report warned severe fluorosis could occur at 2 parts per million. Also, a majority of the report’s authors said a lifetime of drinking water with fluoride at 4 parts per million or higher could raise the risk of broken bones.

In addition, in 2005, the heads of 11 EPA unions, including ones representing the agency’s scientists, pleaded with the EPA to reduce the permissible level of fluoride in water to zero, citing research suggesting it can cause cancer.

In Europe, fluoride is rarely added to water supplies. In Britain, only about 10 percent of the population has fluoridated water. It has been a controversial issue there, with critics arguing people shouldn’t be forced to have “medical treatment” forced on them.

___

Associated Press writers Dina Capiello in Washington, Maria Cheng in London, John Seewer in Toledo, Ohio, David B. Caruso in New York, and Mary Foster in New Orleans contributed to this report, along with AP news researcher Jennifer Farrar in New York.

___

Online:

CDC on fluoridation: http://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation

Dec
1

WE ARE CHANGE CHICAGO MEMBER ASSAULTED AND ARRESTED ON FALSE CHARGES FOR QUESTIONING DR. OZ ABOUT VACCINES

On November 6th, Dr. Oz hosted a health expo in Chicago’s Millennium Park. We Are Change Chicago (WACC) members attended hoping to ask Dr. Oz some questions about the dangers of vaccines. The poisonous additives causing adverse reactions for some people are never discussed in the mainstream media.

The WACC member asked Dr. Oz some questions and he responded very politely. As the WACC member was asking his final question, a man walking with Dr. Oz said, “get this guy out of here”. This man and a second man in the group then grabbed and shoved the WACC member. The WACC member repeatedly asked the second man to stop assaulting him or he would call the police. The second man claimed to be a policeman and told the WACC member to go ahead and call the police. About a half hour later, the police finally arrived and went directly to the second man/perpetrator The responding officers were talking to the perpetrator when the WACC member told them that he was the one who had called 911. While motioning to the perpetrator, the responding officer very rudely replied “no he called” As the WACC member was explaining what happened to the responding officer, they interjected with veiled threats. After some time, and without questioning witnesses, the responding officers asked the WACC member to walk over to the squad car for what he thought was a formal statement. When they got to the car, the police immediately started to frisk him. When he asked what was going on, they informed him that he was being arrested for assault. He was not read his rights and the police wouldn’t tell him who he was being accused of assaulting. He spent over ten hours in police custody. Their final act of intimidation was to prolong his processing. The WACC member found out later that he was arrested for assaulting the perpetrator, who had attacked him. This incident is another example of how law enforcement betrays the public trust and how we are already living in a POLICE STATE!

YouTube Preview Image
Dec
0

Why Is the 9-11 Truth Movement Moving Into the Mainstream?

Mark Jungwirth
We Are Change – Oshkosh
QW Magazine

I am going to begin this by saying that some people may be offended by what is said in this article. It is not my intention at all to offend. And I can say with honesty that if you are offended at what I say, it means that you need to get past a mental block and allow yourself to ask ALL the questions, not just the questions that all the other “good little truthers” expect to hear. That being said, let’s dive right in, shall we?

Recently Geraldo Rivera came out (basically) in support of 9-11 Truth.  At first glance this may seem like a “WIN” for the Truth Movement. But when you consider all the things that we know to be true, the idea that this isn’t a set-up of some sort is preposterous.

We know that the most prominent members of the media attend Bilderberg meetings, the Bohemian Grove ceremonies, Council on Foreign Relations meetings, and are sworn to secrecy. These meetings take place behind armed guards and locked doors. The policies for such meetings are as rigid as can be imagined. Some of these “reporters” are George Stephanopoulos, William F. Buckley Jr., Will Hutton, Andrew Knight, Harry Shearer, Walter Cronkite, the owner of People Magazine, the manager of Time Warner, Charlie Rose, and Chris Matthews, just to name a few. We know that by the early 1900’s the ruling elite purchased all the major forms of media that would allow them to control what was and was not allowed to be presented to the public. And we know that the news broadcasts and radio shows today are so obviously and rigidly controlled that when anyone brings up real issues, the person gets cut off immediately, and is often ridiculed afterward, without having any of their points disproved. And we even know that there are government programs such as Operation Mockingbird and Cointelpro, which are programs that work through major media agencies and broadcasters to spread misinformation and disinformation to manipulate public perception. We know by studying the raw footage of all of the Big 5 (American) TV news agencies, that the news media was intricately involved in the deception that was the 9-11 attacks.

Knowing all these things, it is impossible for me to just accept that when I saw Geraldo Rivera switch stances on the issue of 9-11 Truth, I was seeing a victory for our movement. Given all I know and have experienced in my own research and activism, I find it highly more probable that there is a reason that 9-11 Truth is getting mainstream attention. When the mainstream media sees a group of activists or a social justice leader as “dangerous” to the status quo, they don’t give the group or individual any media time at all. Even bad publicity is good publicity. When you see activists or journalists demonized and treated like dirt on TV, many people think, “Why did they just treat that guy so terribly?” And then they go look into the information that the person who was being demonized was trying to present, and find it to be logical and accurate. I also find 10 times out of 10 that when someone is seen on TV, it is because they are allowed on. Now, just because someone is allowed on TV does not necessarily mean they are complicit in some sort of conspiracy. It just means that whatever information they will be presenting is not damaging to the powers that be, and/or is information that the powers that be want (at least certain) people to see.

Regardless, the only time someone who is genuinely challenging the status quo is allowed on TV is when they already have standing in the public arena and can’t be ignored. So the powers that be may bring this person on to attempt to assassinate their character. On the other hand, if this person does not have standing in the court of public opinion, the media chooses to ignore this person, and gives them zero airtime, and not even a mention.

Let’s apply that to the 9-11 Truth Movement. 9-11 Truth has how much standing in the eyes of the general public? None. Most people don’t want to discuss 9-11, especially in the sense of conspiracy / government complicity. Most people will avoid that conversation at all costs. I have been a researcher / activist exposing 9-11 for the better part of a decade now. I would know. So I have to be skeptical when I see Bob McIlvaine, a 9-11 victim’s family member, on Geraldo Rivera’s show, being given an interview where he isn’t being demonized, he isn’t being made fun of; he is actually being treated quite politely, and shown respect, even as he expresses that he feels that elements of the U.S. government were responsible for 9-11.

Up until this moment in history such a statement was unheard of in mainstream news, unless, of course, it was followed by charges of believing in shape-shifting aliens, or wearing tin-foil hats. So why the drastic difference in treatment all of a sudden? Has the 9-11 Truth movement finally begun to break through to the general public and garner the respect it deserves? I can tell you from thousands of hours as an activist, both on the street and online, that the answer to that question is an honest but disappointing “No”. Are we making a difference? Absolutely. Are we making nearly enough difference to possibly be mentioned positively on TV without it being a set-up? Absolutely not. There may be many people who are unhappy with me for what I am presenting, but I am only presenting what I know to be accurate by my own experience. If this makes you uncomfortable that means you have found one of your current mental blocks and discovered the newest issue for you to work on coming to terms with. For some people this process happens 10 or 20 times. For others it only needs to happen a few times for the individual to be open enough to truly hear all questions, regardless of what emotional response is evoked.

So there it is. Why is the 9-11 truth movement going mainstream? I have a few ideas, but am unwilling to speculate at this time. What I will say is that between this and a few other hairy details I have come to know to be true of the Truth / Patriot movement, my advice to all those who are true out there is to keep your eyes peeled and your ears and minds open. These people have been in control for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. If there is one thing I know that history continuously proves beyond a shadow of a doubt about the relationship of the people who run the world to those fighting them, it is that when you think you have them, they almost certainly have you.

Dec
0

We Are Change Chicago Confronts Radio Show Host Michael Medved

On January 7, 2010 We Are Change Chicago confronted Neo-Con radio show host Michael Medved on the presence of nano-thermite in the World Trade Center dust.  He makes some interesting comments.

YouTube Preview Image

To view the peer-reviewed scientific article “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” see the following link:
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/art…

To view experiments and additional information on thermite/thermate, see the following link:
http://swizzlesteve.com/2010/11/911-experiments-the-great-thermate-debate/

Special Thanks to:
The Reality Report
yungdubble

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Loose Change

&Infowars